Sunday, March 31, 2013

Technology Chronology

Technology Chronology


Libraries have been around since ancient times. The concept of the library has been relatively constant, in that a library is usually recognizable as a library although admittedly there have historically been different schools of thought as to its purpose.  The library's technology has not exhibited the same constancy, which is most assuredly beneficial. One can only imagine how difficult it would be to locate a scroll or scratch information onto a clay tablet. The following is a collection of events and/or objects that I deem to be of importance in shaping the technology in use by libraries today. In a fit of ironic fancy, I have decided to illustrate these events with stitchery, which takes some extra effort, thus making me appreciate these technological advances even more.





Punch Cards
“ The punched card was essentially a data-processing card through which holes were punched in columns that related to specific data or facts” (Black, 2007, p. 292). Notably used in 1936 at University of Texas Libraries, the system and organization laid groundwork for later computerization (Pace, 2009, p641).

Databases
Databases could technically be traced back to the punched cards, however the first word-based formats can be traced to the mid 1960’s as information in a variety of formats was translated to magnetic tape (Neufeld & Cornog, 1986, p.183).  “This evolution of commercially available database services continues today” (Griffiths & King, 2002, p.37). 

MARC
Proposed by the Library of Congress in the late1960's, MARC - Machine Readable Cataloging was adopted in the early 1970's by a majority of libraries. MARC provided a standard for libraries.  MARC was a key in “the transition from card to online catalogs” (Rayward, 2002, p.7).  MARC was key as it was compatible with later library management software (Guy, 2007, p.65). 





Microcomputer
By the late 1970’s and early 1980’s, computers decreased in physical size and there were improvements in speed (Tedd, 2007, p.309). Advances in microcomputers allowed for the implementation of turnkey library management software (Guy, 2007, p.65).



ALS
An automated library system is a “database to house and retrieve a library’s holdings” (Kinner & Rigda, 2009, p. 401). These systems cannot be considered advanced from today’s perspective but they were an important stepping stone (Kinner & Rigda, 2007). “The period from the late 1970’s to early 1980’s was marked by rapid growth in the number of libraries automating their operations” (Borgman, 1997, p. 222).  



OPAC
Online Public Access Catalog, an almost revolutionary concept that the public should be able to access a library's catalog (Guy, 2007, p.67). Early OPACs provided the ability to search by title, class number, or author (Black, 2007, p.318). The first OPACs were most effective when searching for a known item (Tedd, 2007, p.310).

CD-ROM

The 1980’s saw the introduction of CD-ROMs (Rayward, 2002, p. 13). CD-ROMs were adopted as “a carrier for resources and for library catalogs” (McCallum, 2003, p. 4).  CD-ROMs are still used today as carriers for computer programs. 


ILS
Integrated library systems emerged as a merger of automated library systems and the online public access catalog. The integrated library system was the answer for librarians who felt that they had lost control over their collections with the adoption of automated library systems (Kinner & Rigda, 2009, p. 403).  An important event in library technology, it was somewhat tarnished with the introduction and subsequent popularity of GUI and the Internet  (Pace, 2009, p.642).



GUI
An important development, GUI, remodeled the appearance of the (micro)computer with rip-roaring success as it is still utilized today (Pace, 2009, p. 642). GUI helped improve the standardization of OPAC interfaces in the early 1990's (McCallum, 2008, p.4).




Internet 
Although the Internet has existed in previous iterations, i.e. ARPANET,  it was only when the Internet or the World Wide Web emerged in the 1990’s, that there were “profound effects on electronic publishing” (Griffiths & King, 2002, p. 37).  Touted as the “most successful example” in searching and data exchange, the Internet (WWW) introduced new possibilities in scholarly communication, access of library materials, et cetera (Borgman, 1997, p. 230).

Wireless Internet
Wireless Internet allows the library to provide Internet access without being hindered by the number of workstations that are typically high in demand (Bertot, McClure, & Jaeger, 2008, p. 292). There is an increased need to implement Wi-Fi hotspots in libraries. As mobile devices become more prevalent, users expect to be able to access library websites or catalogs from their devices (Barnhart & Pierce, 2011, p.280). Wireless Internet facilitates this process.


Social Media
Social media in its various guises provides a new platform with which to interact with library users. Twitter in particular allows for transmission of information quickly and in real time (Aharony, 2010, p. 334). Information gathered from the use of social media can help libraries make decisions concerning the library - even decisions that involve adopting new technologies (King, 2012, p. 23).



From punched cards to social media, there have been many changes in technology over these years. In the process of researching important developments in library technology, I have a new awareness of the radical changes that have occurred. It was enlightening to realize that certain developments and technologies like the Internet (ARPANET) and automated library systems have been around longer than I previously thought. It was also interesting to see that certain technologies like integrated library systems have not experienced radical changes since their inception resulting in user dissatisfaction.  It will be exciting to see how the technology will continue to change in my lifetime.

References

Aharony, N. (2010). Twitter use in libraries: An exploratory analysis. Journal of Web Librarianship, 4(4), 333-350. doi:10.1080/19322909.2010.48776
Barnhart, F. D., & Pierce, J. E. (2011). Becoming mobile: Reference in the ubiquitous library. Journal of Library Administration, 51(3), 279-290.
Bertot, J., McClure, C. R., & Jaeger, P. T. (2008). The impacts of free public Internet access on public library patrons and communities. Library Quarterly, 78(3), 285-301.
Black, A. (2007). Mechanization in libraries and information retrieval: Punched cards and microfilm before the widespread adoption of computer technology in libraries. Library History, 23(4), 291-299. doi: 10.1179/174581607x254785
Borgman, C. L.  (1997).  From acting locally to thinking globally: A brief history of library automation.  The Library Quarterly, 67(3), 215-249.
Griffiths, J., & King, D. W. (2002). US information retrieval system: Evolution and evaluation (1945-1975).  IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 24(3)  35-55.
Guy, F. (2007). Technological advances and information education 1982-2007: Some perspectives. Education for Information, 25(1), 63-72.
King, D. L.  (2012).  Social media. Library Technology Reports, 48(6), 23-27.
Kinner, L., & Rigda, C. (2009). The integrated library system: From daring to dinosaur? Journal of Library Administration, 49, 401-417. doi: 10.1080/01930820902832546
McCallum, S. (2003). 40 years of technology in libraries: A brief history of information technology, 1963/64-2003. IFLA. Retrieved from http://www.ifla.org/files/assets/information-technology/publications/40-years-of-its.pdf
Neufeld, M. L, & Conog, M. (1986). Database history: From dinosaurs to compact discs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37(4), 183-190.
Pace, A. (2009). 21st  century library systems. Journal of Library Administration49(6), 641-650. doi: 10.1080/01930820903238834
Rayward, W. B. (2002).  A history of computer applications in libraries: Prolegomena. IEEE Annals of the History of Computing, 24(2) 4-15.
Tedd, L. A. (2007). Library management systems in the UK: 1960s – 1980s. Library History, 23(4), 301-316. doi: 10.1179/174581607x254794






17 comments:

  1. First off, this is so cool. I love seeing people combine their interests in a new way--I never thought I'd see a sewing project about technology, but I really like it.

    Secondly, I think GUI is a great pick to be on your timeline. A little Wikipedia research showed me just how often this technology is used (ATMs, info kiosks, self check-outs, etc.). Like so many technologies, GUI is kind of taken for granted, but when you really think about it, you begin to understand how critical it really is.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks so much!

    I really thought a lot about this project. There are just so many innovations in history that led to LIS technology being what it is today. So I really just limited myself to more of the recent events. But I was really close to doing a timeline about the invention of writing and electricity and microchips - but I would have been sewing forever.

    It's hard because from my perspective, and I guess, younger generations in general, your idea of a computer has GUI and a mouse and a keyboard, and so imagining a place where there are dumb terminals and no Internet, and all this stuff. It's really crazy.

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. First of all, I love that you used needlecraft (one of the OLDEST skills in the world) to illustrate the development of technology in the library. Brilliant!

    I also remember computers before the internet and even multicolored monitors, but whether you lived through that or not, retracing our footsteps definitely helps orient us to where we are now and where we are going. There is no escaping the growing role of technology in the library, so we might as well know our roots.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks!

      I found this assignment very enlightening. You must understand your past to comprehend your future type of situation.

      Delete
  5. I agree with our classmates--a very creative presentation! I think you're right about having to choose carefully about what to include; even narrowing the scope down to recent events, provides a lot of material to consider.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks!

      Finding events and then two sources was one of the most challenging parts :)

      Delete
  6. Wowza, what a creative project! I never expected to see a presentation like this. Very cool -- makes me think I should consider using my crocheting skills for an academic purpose in the future. :P

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks so much!

      You should crochet to your heart's content! ;)

      Delete
  7. Very impressive! I do some knitting, but never in a million years would I have thought to incorporate it into a presentation. Great job!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks!

      I think knitting would be a lot harder to incorporate in a presentation. Now I'm just imagining a timeline scarf - which would be basically impossible. But it would be kind of awesome, like Doctor Who. XD

      Delete
    2. Timeline Scarf?! Somebody needs to do this. KIM! It is your destiny!
      Oh my, now I'm envisioning one. Representative colors of each of the Doctors? Oh yes, this could be awesome.

      Delete
    3. LOL. Now I'm just thinking about having each doctor represent a chunk of Earth timeline technology. In my mind right now, I just have 11 wearing a Nemes headdress, and dancing around a la Pee Wee Herman "Tequila" dance, but substituting the word - Papyrus.

      Delete
  8. Great job! This was a very creative way to present the information. You also included some good stuff on your timeline.

    ReplyDelete
  9. This is a very creative way to display a timeline in technology. You did a great job on displaying this type of timeline. I was admiring your integrated library system design and I saw the uniqueness in how you laid out the yarn.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! I was thinking that the ILS was a merger between the ALS and OPAC - so I could use different colors to represent the merger.

      Delete